Let us look at the situation
in 2 dimensions.
Let A be the second largest value of
on
the face F, that is, the value at which the diagonally opposite vertices of F become
High, and let B<A be the value at which a third vertex becomes High.
From the above reasoning we can conclude that we must
select a value c, such that A < c < B, so that
above c the Lows are adjacent, and below c the diagonally opposite Highs are adjacent.
We call c the disambiguation value.
If c is chosen so that -c is also the disambiguation value for
,
then this gives the desired symmetry property. This is because
if we choose the Highs of
as adjacent for
it means that we make the same two vertices (as Lows of
)
adjacent for
(and vice versa).
Thus the topology of
and
will be the same.
We call this disambiguation rule Knit High Above, Knit Low Below, and it
is illustrated in the series of figures 6 through 9.
It is easy to see that the complementary rule of knit Low for values above
the disambiguation value c, and then knit High below the value c,
is inconsistent in two dimensions,
as above c the Highs are path connected through
the face, and so must remain so for all thresholds
.